The ethical case for eating oysters and mussels

It was five years ago this month that I became vegan, or…well, ostrovegan. In this blog I oystersofficially come out of the closet, err, shell.  I am almost sure that cultivated mussels and oysters are ethical to eat. I argue eating these animals is completely consistent with the spirit if not the letter of ethical veganism and the tenet of causing less harm with our consumer choices 1. This blog is on bivalve sentience/ability to suffer; for further arguments, including nutrition arguments, see my second blog.

Are mussels and oysters sentient?

Dividing organisms up into types, or cladistics, is tricky business. Nature did not develop in a way that fits neatly into categories. Dividing up organisms on the basis of sentience, or the ability to suffer, may be even trickier. So, is there any evidence that mussels and oysters don’t suffer?

Argument 1- Oysters and Mussels are not motile

Let me start with a perspective derived from evolutionary theory about how organisms are designed. The function of pain is to help an organism avoid stimuli that may cause them bodily harm. Organisms that are sessile, or unable to move, cannot escape pain and thus there really isn’t any adaptive reason for them to feel pain. Sessile bivalves can open and close their shells but this is as simple an action as plants who close in the presence of noxious stimuli and for a variety of reasons I won’t go into here, plants don’t feel pain. The definition of vegan typically includes not consuming anything of animal origin. And, as animals are most often motile and thus have an adaptive reason to feel pain, this makes sense.

But, mussels and oysters are closely related to other species (e.g. scallops2, squid) who are motile and thus, by my logic, can feel pain, is it possible that they have some leftover capacity to suffer from a common ancestor?3

This is very unlikely because pain is biologically expensive4 In order to feel pain an organism must have to have a sensory system capable of differentiating ‘good’ or adaptive stimuli from ‘bad’ or harmful stimuli. On top of this, the experience of pain is often damaging in and of itself. Finally, in order to facilitate moving away from pain an organism’s priorities change. For instance, pain reduces hunger and the desire to mate. Given that no system is perfect and there is always some rate of misfiring, a sessile organism that experiences pain would get all the harm and none of the benefit of moving away from painful stimuli and thus be at a disadvantage.

ADDENDUM:
-Oysters and mussels have a larval stage that is motile (see this and this). During this larval stage the animals react to stimuli and may even hitch a ride on fish to disperse more widely.  Also, freshwater mussels (which are not commonly eaten by humans) are more motile and can move (albeit slowly). During the larval stage there are neurons present however “many of the larval neurons disappear after metamorphosis“. Both of these facts make me less confident in the motility argument but I still think the other arguments below stand on their own. /Addendum

Argument 2- Oysters and mussels have rudimentary nervous systems and do not seem to use endogenous opiates or opiate receptors to inhibit pain

Mussel nervous system

“[The bivalve] nervous system includes two pairs of nerve cords and three pairs of ganglia. There is no obvious cephalization and the nervous system appears quite simple….to our knowledge there are no published descriptions of  behavioral or neurophysiological responses to tissue injury in bivalves (Crook& Walters 2011).

 

Translation: Bivalves have a very simple nervous system which is not aggregated in anything like a brain. Other invertebrates, like shrimp, show changes in behavior (e.g. grooming their antenna after injury) neurotransmitters or neural firing in response to injury, but previous studies have not shown this kind of response in bivalves.

My conclusion: Bivalves do not have hardware or response consistent with the ability to feel pain. Because they have no brain, or central processing unit for stimuli, there is no ‘there’, there. Just like a disembodied finger, there is no place for sensations to be aggregated into responses or changes in adaptive decision making.5

Many animals have opiate receptors, indicating they are making painkillers and regulating pain within their own nervous system. One way that animal pain is gauged is to administer opiates and see if it influences the behavioral response to pain (e.g.). There is some evidence that bivalves have opioids and opioid receptors but 1) there isn’t good evidence that bivalves have the genes that code for these receptors and 2) it seems that opiates are being used to signal the immune system not to regulate pain. To be honest this is the point on which I am least confident and on which science isn’t yet conclusive.

Argument 3- Eating cultivated oysters and mussels doesn’t doesn’t kill other (sentient) animals at a rate greater than agriculture

Line grown mussels

No food is completely deathless. When you eat plants or grains you are often supporting a  system that kills insects, rodents, and displaces wild animals. Let’s say that you eat shrimps because you doubt that they are sentient. Even if you are on an invertebrate only diet, many species are dredged or netted which involves bycatch, or the deaths of many other organisms after they are harmed by being brought up out of the water and thrown in again. With shrimp, for instance, the rate of bycatch is enormous, sometimes up to 98% of what is caught is discarded, and much of this bycatch is vertebrates. Surely, eating animals that aren’t sentient could not be ethical if it involved significant numbers of deaths for animals that are sentient.

Mussels and oysters, on the other hand are most often farmed in a way that doesn’t involve harm to other sentient beings. From what I can tell from reading in depth about cultivation:

-The only dredging involved in cultivation is collecting spat, or the “seeds” that become mature mussels, however rope cultured mussels don’t generally involve dredging for spat but collecting it on the surface thus not displacing other organisms.

-Oyster and mussel cultivation has been endorsed as good for water quality (e.g. they filter out excess nitrogen) doesn’t involve antibiotics and doesn’t involve killing other animals to feed to them as is the case with farmed fish (e.g. this source is not objective but details many potential environmental benefits from shellfish aquaculture).

-Eating oysters and mussels may involve less other animal death and displacement than eating grains or soy (although I have yet to do a proper calculation on this)

In the next blog I’ve argued that including oysters and mussels as ethically acceptable on a vegan diet undermines naturalistic, nutritional and emotional arguments against veganism thus promoting ethical eating. I’ll also speculate about whether there would be fewer vertebrate eating ex-vegans if ostrovegan was considered an ethically acceptable in a vegan diet. 

Footnotes

1-I’m not the first to argue this. This Slate piece from back in 2010 sketches the argument from sentience and Peter Singer has also been on both sides of this argument earlier endorsing and later renouncing the view that eating sessile bivalves is ethically neutral.

2-I endorse giving motile bivalves like clams and scallops the benefit of the doubt and not eating them. Scallops can swim away from predators and have eyes, which makes them a great deal more cognitively sophisticated.

3-Hat tip to Ian McDonald for pointing out this possibility

4– Brains, often needed in motile organisms, are also biologically expensive:

“The juvenile sea squirt wanders through the sea searching for a suitable rock or hunk of coral to cling to and make its home for life. For this task, it has a rudimentary nervous system. When it finds its spot and takes root, it doesn’t need its brain anymore, so it eats it! It’s rather like getting tenure.” – Daniel C. Dennett

5David Pearce, who disagrees with me and thinks that we should give oysters and mussels the benefit of the doubt (partly because of possible opiate receptors) has conceded this:

“Just as I think it’s possible some of our peripheral ganglia feel phenomenal pain that is inaccessible to the CNS (cf. how one sometimes withdraws one’s hand from a hot stove before one feels the searing pain) it’s possible mussels and oyster ganglia feel something similar. But rights for individal nerve ganglia clearly can’t be high on our list of moral priorities”

Advertisements

257 thoughts on “The ethical case for eating oysters and mussels

  1. You might be interested to know that the link to the “Line grown mussels” image is not functional anymore. May I suggest you download an image to your own website to avoid that (minor) problem in the future?
    Otherwise, thanks for a brilliant, compassionate, informed reflexion on a complex subject.

  2. Pingback: NMP#45: Defining Vegan with Diana Fleischman - Namely Marly

  3. There is no ethical case for eating clams/oysters:

    1. eating clams/oysters is not necessary for human suvival and health

    2. clams/oysters are sentient

    3. plants are not sentient

    4. eating plants is necessary for human survival and health

    That’s all. The rest is just cognitive dissonance, ignorance or sophistry. Self-serving speculation on the (non)suffering of creatures that have no way to prove to us if we’re wrong. It’s already wrong on the basis of the precautionary principle (otherwise known as the Golden Rule).

  4. Because these creatures are “meat”, e.g. recognizable muscle matter, etc. is not a good enough reason to consider that they feel pain. Because they move in a way that we equate with “animal”, doesn’t mean that they feel pain in the same way as we do. What about the venus fly trap?

    It doesn’t feel pain because it’s green? Made from different materials? All I’m saying is, let’s do our assessment on a basis of science, and not on a basis of what our evolved instincts tell us about what we’re looking at.

  5. I eat cows. Sometimes I feel guilty about it. It is environmentally irresponsible. And murderous. I don’t think that cows are particularly intelligent, but they feel pain, which we readily administer to them as we exploit their resources. I will say the same of pigs, which I feel equal guilt for eating. It is slightly more environmentally responsible (less methane, land requirements) to eat pigs than cows, but this is offset by what I perceive to be the pig’s higher intelligence. I wish both animals weren’t so goddamned tasty and available and affordable. I do feel less guilty about eating chicken, even though they may be the most poorly treated of all livestock. I guess it comes down to intelligence once again, but maybe I am being ironically naïve. Fish? I don’t think twice. They’re stupid creatures. I do have reservations about eating octopus though. I have seen their intelligence demonstrated and it solidifies my case that there is a definite correlation between an animal’s potential intelligence and my willingness to eat them on a whim. Don’t get me wrong- if it’s a matter of life or death, all of this goes out the window. I will eat YOU if I have to. But oysters?! Gimme a break. Guilt-free delight that I would eat by the thousands if they weren’t so damned expensive. They have no brains. What’s the argument here?! In a glass of Clamato juice, the tomato harvest probably has greater collateral damage to wildlife than the clams do. So many self-righteous people here would love to believe that their beloved organic asparagus has zero negative effect on the ecosystem. I get that you’re trying to minimize your footprint, and I will not tell you to shut up and eat a steak, but I WILL suggest that you get over yourselves and shuck a few oysters. If you do it in private, I promise you’ll be the only one that knows. (Get it? The oysters won’t even know!)

    • I know a man hears what he wants to hear, but from this I hear that you’re a thinker and have thought about all these issues. Yes, pigs and octopus are so damn smart, it’s distressing. That they do suffer so. Cows and other eaten animals also very smart, very sentient. Surprisingly similar to dogs and cats. The reason I’m writing this is to suggest that you visit somewhere where you can experience first hand the true nature of these creatures. A rescue sanctuary would be great. You can just quietly experience these individuals, and ignore anything you don’t want to be told. It may or may not have impact on the progress of your thinking, but if decisions are made and stands are taken by intelligent, thinking beings, the more informed those approaches, the better. Hopefully, you can also access a range of vegan foods to also compare. They’re usually the first to sell out at eateries, even when stocked in the same quantities as the omnivore alternatives. Obviously, I’m writing from a vegan viewpoint, but it would be great to have another smart, thinking individual on the side of truth. Thank you for reading 🙂

  6. Pingback: The Plant-Eater’s Dilemma | Enviro-Mental

  7. Pingback: optimal foods for YOU | optimising nutrition

  8. I love oysters n mussels but since there’s no definite answer to them not sensing pain guess it’s best to leave them be. It all depends on how sincere we are in being a compassion vegan, if one yearns for meat and seafood yet struggling mad in restraining from eating them that itself would actually harm your cultivation if you’re a vegan for the sake of religion. You’ll risk becoming the animal you desire to eat when you think of it at the moment of your last breath….so first sever or tame completely your attachment before deciding to be a real vegan. Good luck.

  9. If you can ignore the simple fact that the creature you choose to eat does not want to die just as much as you don’t want to die then go ahead and eat it. Justifying your needs with twisting logic really isn’t necessary or meaningful. It’s clearly a case of you first, which is entirely your prerogative.

  10. Pingback: Are Bivalves Vegan? Specifically Oysters and Mussels? – Low Fat

  11. Pingback: Are Oysters Vegan and Can You Eat Oysters As A Vegan?

  12. Pingback: Are Bivalves Vegan? Specifically Oysters and Mussels? | Vegan

  13. Pingback: Have Bananas, Will Travel: How to Stay High-Fruit on the Road

  14. Pingback: Are Bivalves Vegan? Specifically Oysters and Mussels? | Whole Organic

  15. Pingback: Oysters, Mussels and Clams, Oh My! – InVEGtigator

  16. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | CocoBowlz

  17. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – mrbillbrazil

  18. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – My Blog

  19. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | Naturally Healthy Life

  20. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | My Blog

  21. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | Products For You

  22. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – WordPress Site

  23. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | Halifax Bio Identical Hormone Replacement

  24. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | Halifax Skin

  25. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax Vanquish

  26. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax skin care

  27. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax skin Laser

  28. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax Exilis Elite

  29. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax Botox

  30. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Top Live Breaking News

  31. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax Dysport

  32. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Halifax Juvederm

  33. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? - Curious Center

  34. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? – Mens Health

  35. Pingback: Can a Vegan Go Keto? | Healthy Not Crazy

  36. Pingback: Entender de evolução fez de mim vegana - SimplesMente

  37. Pingback: The Oyster Lady - Ethical Suppliers (Pty) Ltd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s